Three objection types account for nearly three-quarters of what simulated opposing counsel raises during direct examination practice. What each one is, why advocates keep walking into it, and how to stop.
A simulated tribunal that rules without explaining is a coin toss with a gavel. We describe how Simulation records each ruling, how we checked 600 of them against practitioners, and where it still disagrees.
It is 21:15 and opening is at 10:00. Half an hour in Simulation, used in the right order, will tell you which of your pleadings is weakest and whether your opening answers the question the tribunal will ask first.
Transcripts carry more than words. A guide to the hesitation patterns worth marking before cross-examination, how Simulation surfaces them, and the ways they mislead.
Simulation models venues, not named arbitrators. This note sets out what a corpus of published awards actually supports, where selection bias defeats it, and why we stopped short.
After a year in limited release, Simulation is open to all accounts: an AI tribunal, opposing counsel and witnesses, scorecards you can argue with, and 22 venues modelled.
